There may be nothing in the clinical lab that wastes more time and is more poorly implemented and understood than hematology review criteria. Hematology is a strange animal. It doesn't lend itself to sharp black and white rules and distinctions. It's subjective, murky and sometimes frustrating because you must deal with things like: How many atypical lymphs are significant? How atypical must they be to count? Should you look at a slide with a low hemoglobin? Why? Does a pathologist need to look at a slide with macrocytosis? These, and the dozens of questions like them, are the type of nebulous questions you have to deal with daily in hematology. And most labs do a lousy job of addressing them. The result? Too much unneeded work.
Read more
Check That Slide on ADVANCE for Medical Laboratory Professionals
Source: ADVANCE
Art and Science of Laboratory Medicine
1 comment:
| for result interpretation & anemia diagnosis...*
Post a Comment