No significant difference could be observed between the first and the second serum tubes for any of the parameters. The bias calculated with Bland-Altman plots did not achieve statistical significance when the serum tube was collected after either a K2-EDTA or a sodium citrate tube.
According to this data, revision of national and supranational recommendations on blood collection by venipuncture should consider that the order of draw exerts a negligible effect on sample quality, and this aspect should no longer be considered a quality criterion when evaluating the performance of phlebotomists.
Read more:
The order of draw: myth or science?
Source: Unbound medline
Art and Science of Laboratory Medicine
Facebook: www.facebook.com/LaboratoryEQAS
Twitter: LaboratoryEQAS
2 comments:
The sample size of 115 is laughably small to suggest such sweeping changes, especially since we in the lab see the effects of EDTA cross-contamination all the time. Or do the authors have another explanation for the severe hyperkalemia/hypocalcemia we see when the order of draw is ignored, the effects of which "mysteriously" disappear after a re-draw?
I'd venture to guess that the people who set up the study have never actually worked in a lab.
Did they collect the sample according to normal protocol? What if they tilt the tubes to purposely contaminate the needle on the vacutainer holder? Why didn't they test affects on coagulation results? Contamination with potassium may be negligible but may affect these results. Did the serum tubes have no additive OR clot activator in them? This would also affect coagulation results as well. I would want more studies to be performed before I change my SOPs AND what I am teaching nursing staff when they transfer blood.
Post a Comment